Callison v. Logan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Callison v. Logan

468 S.W.3d 477, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 861, 2015 WL 5134643

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 1, 2015·No. No. ED 102552·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

William Logan appeals from the Judgment of Contempt in favor of Ronald and Virginia Callison and the award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,345.00. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to "this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided ■ a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

William Logan appeals from the Judgment of Contempt in favor of Ronald and Virginia Callison and the award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $3,345.00. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to "this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided ■ a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Callison v. Logan, 468 S.W.3d 477, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 861, 2015 WL 5134643 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

468 S.W.3d 477 (Callison v. Logan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.