Calliham v. Commissioner

1985 T.C. Memo. 381, 50 T.C.M. 559, 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 256
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJuly 29, 1985
DocketDocket No. 30590-83.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1985 T.C. Memo. 381 (Calliham v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calliham v. Commissioner, 1985 T.C. Memo. 381, 50 T.C.M. 559, 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 256 (tax 1985).

Opinion

PAUL D. CALLIHAM, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Calliham v. Commissioner
Docket No. 30590-83.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1985-381; 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 256; 50 T.C.M. (CCH) 559; T.C.M. (RIA) 85381;
July 29, 1985.

*256 Held: (1) P is liable for the addition to tax for fraud under sec. 6653(b), I.R.C. 1954, for 1980 and 1981.

(2) The United States is entitled to an award of damages under sec. 6673, I.R.C. 1954.

Keith H. Johnson, for the*257 respondent.

SIMPSON

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

SIMPSON, Judge: The Commissioner determined the following deficiencies in, and additions to, the petitioner's Federal income taxes:

Additions to Tax
Sec. 6653(b)Sec. 6654
YearDeficiencyI.R.C. 1954 1I.R.C. 1954
1980$3,574.00$1,787.00
1981$7,254.00$3,627.00$556.00

The issues for decision are: (1) Whether the petitioner is liable for the addition to tax for fraud under section 6653(b) for 1980 and 1981; and (2) whether the United States is entitled to an award of damages under section 6673.

FINDINGS OF FACT

None of the facts have been stipulated.

The petitioner, Paul D. Calliham, was a legal resident of Tampa, Fla., at the time he filed his petition in this case. He filed tax protestor type documents in lieu of a proper Federal income tax return for 1980. The documents filed by the petitioner for 1980 were typical of the documents submitted in lieu of proper tax returns by members of the Keystone Society, *258 an organization that advocated that wages were not taxable income. He filed no documents as a tax return for 1981.

During 1980, the petitioner received wages totaling $19,180.64 and interest of $23.00. During 1981, he received wages totaling $29,575.53. The petitioner timely received from his employers Forms W-2 which showed the wages paid to him in 1980. Prior to 1980, the petitioner filed Federal income tax returns which reported his wages as income.

During 1980, the petitioner submitted at least one Form W-4 (Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate) to one of his employers; on such form, he claimed that he was exempt from Federal income tax withholding. During 1981, he submitted at least one other Form W-4 claiming to be exempt from Federal income tax withholding, and he submitted Forms W-4 claiming exempt status to his employers during 1982 and 1984.

In his notice of deficiency, the Commissioner determined that the petitioner had received $19,203.64 in taxable income in 1980 and $29,575.53 in taxable income in 1981. In addition, he determined that the petitioner was liable for the addition to tax for fraud under section 6653(b) for both 1980 and 1981 and that the*259 petitioner was liable for the addition to tax for failure to pay estimated tax under section 6654 for 1981. The notice of deficiency also contained a statement informing the petitioner that wages are taxable income and that the position advocated by the Keystone Society was frivolous and groundless. Such statement further informed the petitioner that if he asserted frivolous and groundless positions in a Tax Court proceeding, the Commissioner would seek an award of damages under section 6673.

OPINION

The petitioner did not appear for the trial of his case. The Commissioner moved to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute as to the deficiencies and the addition to tax under section 6654 for underpayment of estimated tax for 1981, and the Court indicated that it would grant such motion. Thus, the first issue for decision is whether the petitioner is liable for the addition to tax for fraud for 1980 and 1981.

Section 6653(b) provides that if any part of any underpayment of tax required to be shown on a return is due to fraud, there shall be added to the tax an amount equal to 50 percent of the underpayment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spies v. United States
317 U.S. 492 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Acker v. Commissioner
26 T.C. 107 (U.S. Tax Court, 1956)
Miller v. Commissioner
51 T.C. 915 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Otsuki v. Commissioner
53 T.C. 96 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Beaver v. Commissioner
55 T.C. 85 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Stone v. Commissioner
56 T.C. 213 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Gajewski v. Commissioner
67 T.C. 181 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)
Reiff v. Commissioner
77 T.C. 1169 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)
Habersham-Bey v. Commissioner
78 T.C. No. 22 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)
Thompson v. Commissioner
78 T.C. No. 38 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)
Jarvis v. Commissioner
78 T.C. No. 45 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)
Rowlee v. Commissioner
80 T.C. No. 61 (U.S. Tax Court, 1983)
Hebrank v. Commissioner
81 T.C. No. 36 (U.S. Tax Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1985 T.C. Memo. 381, 50 T.C.M. 559, 1985 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calliham-v-commissioner-tax-1985.