Callier v. Administrator of Jeffries

Superior Court of North Carolina

Callier v. Administrator of Jeffries

3 N.C. 400

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1806·Published

Opinion

Taylor, Judge.

The reading, by the plaintiff, of a deposition •' alcen by the defendant, is an intimation to the defendant that its regularity will not be questioned; and it would be unjust in the highest degree to take advantage of his inability to make proof of its regularity, when he has been induced by the plaintiff’s intimation to leave them at home:

The deposition was read without proof of notice of the taking.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor, Judge.

The reading, by the plaintiff, of a deposition •' alcen by the defendant, is an intimation to the defendant that its regularity will not be questioned; and it would be unjust in the highest degree to take advantage of his inability to make proof of its regularity, when he has been induced by the plaintiff’s intimation to leave them at home:

The deposition was read without proof of notice of the taking.

Callier v. Administrator of Jeffries, 3 N.C. 400 (N.C. Ct. App. 1806).

Pincite

3 N.C. 400 (Callier v. Administrator of Jeffries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.