Callier v. Administrator of Jeffries

Superior Court of North Carolina

Callier v. Administrator of Jeffries

3 N.C. 400

DecidedJuly 5, 1806

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 400 (Callier v. Administrator of Jeffries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Callier v. Administrator of Jeffries, 3 N.C. 400 (N.C. Ct. App. 1806).

Pincite

Opinion

Taylor, Judge.

The reading, by the plaintiff, of a deposition •' alcen by the defendant, is an intimation to the defendant that its regularity will not be questioned; and it would be unjust in the highest degree to take advantage of his inability to make proof of its regularity, when he has been induced by the plaintiff’s intimation to leave them at home:

The deposition was read without proof of notice of the taking.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor, Judge.

The reading, by the plaintiff, of a deposition •' alcen by the defendant, is an intimation to the defendant that its regularity will not be questioned; and it would be unjust in the highest degree to take advantage of his inability to make proof of its regularity, when he has been induced by the plaintiff’s intimation to leave them at home:

The deposition was read without proof of notice of the taking.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.C. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callier-v-administrator-of-jeffries-ncsuperct-1806.