Callie v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Callie v. State

64 S.W.3d 274, 347 Ark. 363, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 4

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 10, 2002·No. CR 01-1351·Published

Opinion

P ER CURIAM.

Appellant Lloyd Callie, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, James O. Cox, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

IMBER, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P ER CURIAM.

Appellant Lloyd Callie, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, James O. Cox, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

IMBER, J., not participating.

Callie v. State, 64 S.W.3d 274, 347 Ark. 363, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 4 (Ark. 2002).

Pincite

64 S.W.3d 274 (Callie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.