Callicott v. Horn

135 So. 215, 161 Miss. 395
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 10, 1931·No. No. 28923.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

On a former day of this term, March 30, 1931, this court rendered its opinion herein and entered its judgment reversing the cause and rendering a decree here for the appellant. 133 So. 217. Thereafter, on April 30, 1931, the appellee, through his counsel, filed a suggestion of error which has since that date been pending here. On May 6, 1931, counsel for the appellee filed a petition for revivor, in which it is made known to the court that Paulus Horn, the appellee, died on the 27th day of March, 1931, and was dead on the date of the rendition of the judgment herein. The judgment heretofore rendered will therefore be vacated, the former opinion withdrawn, and this cause will be revived in the name of the petitioners, legal representatives and heirs at law of Paulus Horn, deceased, and the cause will be remanded to the docket and set for hearing on the first call of Division A in September, 1931, to which term and date this cause is continued.

Counsel for Mrs. Callicott may, if they see proper, answer the brief on suggestion of error now on file.

Chapman v. White Sewing Machine Co., 77 Miss. 890, 28 So. 749, is authority for the procedure herein outlined.

Former decree vacated, and cause ordered revived in the name of the petitioners.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Callicott v. Horn, 135 So. 215, 161 Miss. 395 (Mich. 1931).

135 So. 215 (Callicott v. Horn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. Anderson
121 So. 2d 393 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1960)
Glad Tidings Church of America v. Hinkley
226 P.2d 1016 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1951)
Metzler v. Iacone
55 A.2d 81 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1947)
Succession of Kreher
153 So. 700 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1934)