Callicoatte v. State

135 S.W. 124, 61 Tex. Crim. 420, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 111
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 1, 1911
DocketNo. 885.
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.W. 124 (Callicoatte v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Callicoatte v. State, 135 S.W. 124, 61 Tex. Crim. 420, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 111 (Tex. 1911).

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

—The appellant was convicted of unlawfully engaging in and pursuing the occupation and business of selling intoxicating liquors in Camp County, Texas, a county where prohibition is in force, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the State penitentiary.

*421 There are no bills of exception in the record, and the motion for a new trial only raises the question of the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the Verdict. The' evidence is amply sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. Chas. Duncan, Will Brown, Ed Dufley, Charlie Wade, John Ashaway, Bill Shaw, John Craig, Andy Adams, and others testify they had purchased whisky from defendant in Camp County on divers occasions and at different times.

The indictment in this cause is in exact terms of Mizell v. State, 59 Texas Crim. Rep., 226, 128 S. W. Rep., 125, and approved in Slack v. State, decided at this term of court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mizell v. State
128 S.W. 125 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.W. 124, 61 Tex. Crim. 420, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callicoatte-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.