Callendar v. Tedford

126 F. App'x 42
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 2005
DocketNo. 04-4583-PR
StatusPublished

This text of 126 F. App'x 42 (Callendar v. Tedford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Callendar v. Tedford, 126 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2005).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the appeal be DISMISSED.

Appellant Allen Callendar appeals from the judgment of the district court dismissing without prejudice his complaint for failure to state a claim and granting him leave to file an amended complaint. On appeal, Callendar asserts that the court erred in denying him leave to amend his complaint before it was dismissed. Callendar requests that this Court reverse the district court’s judgment so that Callendar may amend his complaint. Because the district court explicitly granted Callendar leave to amend, Callendar is not appealing, as he must, from a final judgment, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and, in any event, has no grounds for appeal since he obtained what he sought in the district court.

For the foregoing reasons, the appeal is DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 F. App'x 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callendar-v-tedford-ca2-2005.