Callen v. Comsewogue School District

95 A.D.3d 814, 942 N.Y.S.2d 818
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 95 A.D.3d 814 (Callen v. Comsewogue School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Callen v. Comsewogue School District, 95 A.D.3d 814, 942 N.Y.S.2d 818 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), dated October 3, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly was injured when she tripped over a chain, suspended between two poles, used to block off an access roadway located at Comsewogue High School. At her deposition, the plaintiff testified that the chain hit her at a “high ankle or low shin” level.

The defendant established, prima facie, that the chain was open and obvious, i.e., readily observable by those employing the reasonable use of their senses, and not inherently dangerous (see Thomas v Pleasantville Union Free School Dist., 79 AD3d 853, 854 [2010]; Badalbaeva v City of New York, 55 AD3d 764, 765 [2008]; Siegenfeld v Long Is. Power Auth., 46 AD3d 798, 799 [2007]; Sun Ho Chung v Jeong Sook Joh, 29 AD3d 677, 678 [2006]; Plis v North Bay Cadillac, 5 AD3d 578 [2004]; Cupo v Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48, 51-52 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Rivera, J.E, Hall, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrissette v. Kismat Indian Rest., Inc.
2021 NY Slip Op 04220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Sneed v. Fulton Park Four Assoc., L.P.
2021 NY Slip Op 01797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
LeComples v. More Specialized Transport, Inc.
2016 NY Slip Op 7298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Simon Ex Rel. Simon v. Comsewogue School District
143 A.D.3d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Lazic v. Trump Village Section 3, Inc. Co-Op
134 A.D.3d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 814, 942 N.Y.S.2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callen-v-comsewogue-school-district-nyappdiv-2012.