Callea v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
This text of 254 A.D.2d 696 (Callea v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff Ronald Callea was removing tree limbs that interfered with a high voltage power line when he fell from the tree and sustained serious injuries. The work being performed by him was not “ ‘necessary and incidental to or an integral part’ of a protected activity involving a building or structure under Labor Law § 240 (1)” (McGregor v Bravo, 251 AD2d 1002, 1003). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 A.D.2d 696, 677 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callea-v-niagara-mohawk-power-corp-nyappdiv-1998.