Callea v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

254 A.D.2d 696, 677 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10355
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 2, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 696 (Callea v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Callea v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 254 A.D.2d 696, 677 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff Ronald Callea was removing tree limbs that interfered with a high voltage power line when he fell from the tree and sustained serious injuries. The work being performed by him was not “ ‘necessary and incidental to or an integral part’ of a protected activity involving a building or structure under Labor Law § 240 (1)” (McGregor v Bravo, 251 AD2d 1002, 1003). (Appeal from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gavin v. Long Island Lighting Co.
255 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 696, 677 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callea-v-niagara-mohawk-power-corp-nyappdiv-1998.