Calle v. Metropolitan Dade County

511 So. 2d 619, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1641, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1837
StatusPublished

This text of 511 So. 2d 619 (Calle v. Metropolitan Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calle v. Metropolitan Dade County, 511 So. 2d 619, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1641, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing a complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. It cannot be said that the pleadings are so inconsistent with the attached exhibits as to neutralize each other. See Harry Pepper & Assocs. v. Lasseter, 247 So.2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 252 So.2d 797 (Fla.1971). The sufficiency of the evidence which the plaintiff is likely to produce may not be considered on a motion to dismiss. N.E. at West Palm Beach, Inc. v. Horowitz, 471 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded.

HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

NE at West Palm Beach v. Horowitz
471 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. Lasseter
247 So. 2d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 So. 2d 619, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1641, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calle-v-metropolitan-dade-county-fladistctapp-1987.