Calle v. Metropolitan Dade County

511 So. 2d 619, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1641, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 1987·No. No. 86-1837·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing a complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action. It cannot be said that the pleadings are so inconsistent with the attached exhibits as to neutralize each other. See Harry Pepper & Assocs. v. Lasseter, 247 So.2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 252 So.2d 797 (Fla.1971). The sufficiency of the evidence which the plaintiff is likely to produce may not be considered on a motion to dismiss. N.E. at West Palm Beach, Inc. v. Horowitz, 471 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed and remanded.

HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Calle v. Metropolitan Dade County, 511 So. 2d 619, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1641, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9258 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

511 So. 2d 619 (Calle v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

NE at West Palm Beach v. Horowitz
471 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. Lasseter
247 So. 2d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)