Callaway v. Webster

1 Rob. 553
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Martin, J.

The plaintiff claims certain arrears of rent from the defendant, his lessee, and the cancelling- of the lease. The defendant pleaded the general issue,and, in a supplemental answer, alleged that the premises Were in a dilapidated state; that it became necessary to repair them ; and that the plaintiff, as well as the persons from whom he holds, refused to be at any expense therefor ; whereupon, he effected there pairs at his own expense, and he claims their value in reconvention. The plaintiff recovered three hundred and seven dollars, and the lease was cancelled. The defendant appealed. His counsel has contended, that the judgment ought to be reversed: 1. Because it is not one of non-suit with regard to the claim in re-convention, but has the force of res judicata as to said claim. 2. Because no notice was given to the defendant of the day of trial of the suit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Callaway v. Webster, 1 Rob. 553 (La. 1842).

1 Rob. 553 (Callaway v. Webster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarver v. Quinn
89 So. 216 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1921)