Callaway v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Callaway v. State

127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 599, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 626

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 27, 1925

Docket16183

StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 302 (Callaway v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Callaway v. State, 127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 599, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 626 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

This court can’ not say that the verdict finding the accused guilty of burglary is without evidence to support it, and, the trial judge having approved it in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based on the usual general grounds only, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Hugh H. Combs, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Fel{s, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

This court can’ not say that the verdict finding the accused guilty of burglary is without evidence to support it, and, the trial judge having approved it in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based on the usual general grounds only, the judgment must be

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Hugh H. Combs, for plaintiff in error. M. L. Fel{s, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.E. 302, 33 Ga. App. 599, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callaway-v-state-gactapp-1925.