Callanan v. Kossuth County

62 N.W. 784, 94 Iowa 408
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided April 6, 1895·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case comes to the court on the certificate of the trial judge, because of the amount in controversy. Appellee makes the point of the jurisdiction of this court, because it does not appear when the certificate was .signed. The point is well taken. It does not appear when it was signed, — whether at the time of entering judgment, or at the term. The fact is jurisdictional. This precise question was presented and ruled upon in Hakes v. Dott, 54 Iowa, 17. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Callanan v. Kossuth County, 62 N.W. 784, 94 Iowa 408 (iowa 1895).

62 N.W. 784 (Callanan v. Kossuth County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hakes v. Dott
6 N.W. 70 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1880)