Callanan v. Kossuth County

62 N.W. 784, 94 Iowa 408
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedApril 6, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.W. 784 (Callanan v. Kossuth County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Callanan v. Kossuth County, 62 N.W. 784, 94 Iowa 408 (iowa 1895).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case comes to the court on the certificate of the trial judge, because of the amount in controversy. Appellee makes the point of the jurisdiction of this court, because it does not appear when the certificate was .signed. The point is well taken. It does not appear when it was signed, — whether at the time of entering judgment, or at the term. The fact is jurisdictional. This precise question was presented and ruled upon in Hakes v. Dott, 54 Iowa, 17. The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hakes v. Dott
6 N.W. 70 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.W. 784, 94 Iowa 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callanan-v-kossuth-county-iowa-1895.