Callahan v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Callahan v. Thomas

42 So. 2d 534, 252 Ala. 617, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 508

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedOctober 13, 1949

Docket7 Div. 963.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 42 So. 2d 534 (Callahan v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Callahan v. Thomas, 42 So. 2d 534, 252 Ala. 617, 1949 Ala. LEXIS 508 (Ala. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

SIMPSON, Justice.

Consideration of the motion to strike the transcript of the evidence commands attention first and is dispositive of the appeal. The transcript was not filed until 183 days after the rendition of the judgment and the motion to strike must be sustained. Dewrell v. Kearley, 250 Ala. 18, 32 So.2d 812; General Acts 1943, p. 423, Supreme Court Rule 48, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix.

Since the matters sought to be .reviewed relate to questions of evidence, with the transcript stricken, no further consideration may be tendered the appeal and the judgment must be affirmed.

Motion to strike granted and judgment affirmed.

BROWN, FOSTER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI