Callahan v. Terminal Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Callahan v. Terminal Cab Corp.

234 A.D. 794

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 794 (Callahan v. Terminal Cab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Callahan v. Terminal Cab Corp., 234 A.D. 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

■—■ As to defendant Terminal Cab Corporation, judgment as amended unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. As to defendant Peirson, judgment as amended reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court erred in its charge at folio 517 with respect to the so-called “ second regulation ” in regard to traffic. That regulation has no application to the situation herein. (Cohen v. Goodman & Sons, Inc., 189 App. Div. 209.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■—■ As to defendant Terminal Cab Corporation, judgment as amended unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. As to defendant Peirson, judgment as amended reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court erred in its charge at folio 517 with respect to the so-called “ second regulation ” in regard to traffic. That regulation has no application to the situation herein. (Cohen v. Goodman & Sons, Inc., 189 App. Div. 209.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callahan-v-terminal-cab-corp-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack