Callahan v. Terminal Cab Corp.
234 A.D. 794
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1931·Published
Opinion
■—■ As to defendant Terminal Cab Corporation, judgment as amended unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. As to defendant Peirson, judgment as amended reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The court erred in its charge at folio 517 with respect to the so-called “ second regulation ” in regard to traffic. That regulation has no application to the situation herein. (Cohen v. Goodman & Sons, Inc., 189 App. Div. 209.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Callahan v. Terminal Cab Corp., 234 A.D. 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
234 A.D. 794 (Callahan v. Terminal Cab Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cohen v. A. Goodman & Sons, Inc.
189 A.D. 209 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)