Callahan v. State
75 Ga. 887
Opinion
Where a motion for new trial was made on the ground of newly discovered evidence, and it did not appear that due diligence was exercised to procure the evidence at the trial, and the newly discovered evidence was negative in its character and effect, and was [888]*888cumulative and tended only to impeach a witness for the state, a new trial was properly refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Callahan v. State, 75 Ga. 887 (Ga. 1886).
75 Ga. 887 (Callahan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.