Callahan v. Shaw
This text of 110 A.D. 917 (Callahan v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, for the error in the exclusion of evidence on pages 8 and 9 of the stenographer’s minutes, designed to prove that the plaintiff was employed under an agreement for compensation by the other prospective contracting party. Hirschberg, P. J., Bartlett, Woodward, Jenks and Hooker, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D. 917, 96 N.Y.S. 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callahan-v-shaw-nyappdiv-1905.