Callahan v. Maurice Realty, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Callahan v. Maurice Realty, Inc.

259 A.D.2d 264, 684 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2302

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 2, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 264 (Callahan v. Maurice Realty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Callahan v. Maurice Realty, Inc., 259 A.D.2d 264, 684 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered April 9, 1998, which denied defendants’ motion for summary [265]*265judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff has made a prima facie showing that defendants provided inadequate electrical outlets in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-3172, and defendants are charged with notice of such violation. Further, we agree with the court that material issues of fact exist with respect to whether defendants’ negligence, if any, was a proximate cause of plaintiffs’ injuries. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered April 9, 1998, which denied defendants’ motion for summary [265]*265judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff has made a prima facie showing that defendants provided inadequate electrical outlets in violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-3172, and defendants are charged with notice of such violation. Further, we agree with the court that material issues of fact exist with respect to whether defendants’ negligence, if any, was a proximate cause of plaintiffs’ injuries. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 264, 684 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callahan-v-maurice-realty-inc-nyappdiv-1999.