Callahan v. Lott

42 Ala. 167
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 42 Ala. 167 (Callahan v. Lott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Callahan v. Lott, 42 Ala. 167 (Ala. 1868).

Opinion

JUDGE, J.

There has been no trial in the circuit court, of the facts alleged in the petition in this case, and the order of the circuit judge, made in vacation, superseding the execution, and directing the cause to be placed upon the trial docket, will not support an appeal. The correct practice in such cases, is plainly indicated in the case of Pratt & McKenzie v. Keils & Sylvester, 28 Ala. 390.

We may remark, for the future guidance of the parlies in the court below, that the petition does not seem fully to conform to the requisitions of section 2408, and 2409, of the Code. All the facts relied upon to obtain the relief sought, should be set forth in the petition of the applicants; the affidavits of third persons, though they may be looked to for other purposes, cannot be considered as parts of the petition. The petition, however, may be amended in the court below.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowden v. Perdue
59 Ala. 409 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
McLendon v. Darden & Co.
53 Ala. 67 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Ex parte North
49 Ala. 385 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1873)
Carroll v. Vaughan
48 Ala. 352 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 Ala. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callahan-v-lott-ala-1868.