Callahan v. Liacos

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

April 18, 1996

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



                                 ____________________


No. 95-1553

        No. 95-1554


ELAINE M. CALLAHAN,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                            CHIEF JUSTICE LIACOS, ET AL.,



                                Defendants, Appellees.


____________________



                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



                     [Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                 Selya, Cyr and Lynch,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Elaine M. Callahan on briefs pro se.
            __________________


____________________


____________________


Per  Curiam.    We  have reviewed  the  record  and
                      ___________



plaintiff's appellate filings.   We affirm substantially  for



            the  reasons  stated by  the  district  court  in its  orders



            dismissing plaintiff's  actions.  See also  Doyle v. Oklahoma
                                              ___ ____  _________________



            Bar Ass'n, 998 F.2d 1559 (10th Cir. 1993).  
            _________



                      Plaintiff's request to  stay appellate  proceedings



            and for oral argument are denied.



                      Affirmed.
                      ________


-3-