Callahan v. City of Boston
This text of 55 N.E. 892 (Callahan v. City of Boston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is not denied that the defendant is liable to the plaintiff under St. 1892, c. 270, if that statute is constitutional. The effect of that act is that if a city or town sees fit voluntarily to order the construction of public works owned by it, then, nolens volens, it must assume a part of the responsibility of an employer to the workmen employed by the contractor with whom it deals. It is intended to be a milder application of the principle of the mechanic’s lien laws. We see no constitutional objection to the law. It is a familiar type of statute, and has been upheld heretofore. Hart v. Boston, Revere Beach, Lynn Railroad, 121 Mass. 510. A compulsory relation of master and servant is not unknown even to the common law. Benjamin v. Dockham, 134 Mass. 418.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 N.E. 892, 175 Mass. 201, 1900 Mass. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callahan-v-city-of-boston-mass-1900.