Callaham v. Ridgeway
135 S.E. 646, 138 S.C. 10, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 210
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The facts of this cause are set out fully in the report of A. C. Todd, Esq., special referee. That report and the decree of his Honor, circuit Judge Featherstone, both of which will be reported, are entirely satisfactory to this Court.
The judgment of this Court is that the exceptions of the appellant be overruled, and that the decree of Judge Feather-stone, which confirmed the report of the referee, be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Callaham v. Ridgeway, 135 S.E. 646, 138 S.C. 10, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 210 (S.C. 1926).
135 S.E. 646 (Callaham v. Ridgeway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. Element Brand Holdings, LLC
D. South Carolina, 2021
Laidlaw Environmental Servs., (TOC), Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.
966 F. Supp. 1401 (D. South Carolina, 1996)
Jay Cee Fish Co. v. Cannarella
279 F. Supp. 67 (D. South Carolina, 1968)
Southern Frozen Foods, Inc. v. Hill
129 S.E.2d 420 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1963)
Evatt v. Campbell
106 S.E.2d 447 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)
Ophuls & Hill, Inc. v. Carolina Ice & Fuel Co.
158 S.E. 824 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1931)
Scott v. Stone
147 S.E. 449 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)
Blank v. Michael
226 N.W. 12 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1928)
Koth v. Board of Education
140 S.E. 99 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1927)