Callaghan v. Hawkes

121 Mass. 298, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 361
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 14, 1876·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The clause in question, in form and necessary legal construction, is enabling and not restrictive, and confers upon the lessor a right which he would not otherwise have had. Independently of, and notwithstanding this clause, he may sell the reversion. The whole effect of the clause was to enable him to terminate the lease, and sell the whole estate, first giving the lessees the opportunity of purchasing. This construction is fortified by the final clause, which allows to the lessees, in case of sale, the privilege of taking off the crops.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Callaghan v. Hawkes, 121 Mass. 298, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 361 (Mass. 1876).

121 Mass. 298 (Callaghan v. Hawkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JRY CORP. v. LeRoux
464 N.E.2d 82 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1984)
Seward v. Weeks
274 N.E.2d 813 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1971)
Lowell v. First Church of Christ
143 A.2d 671 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1958)
Gilbert v. Van Kleeck
284 A.D. 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)
Levy v. Peabody
130 N.E. 261 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)