Callaghan v. Hawkes
Opinion
The clause in question, in form and necessary legal construction, is enabling and not restrictive, and confers upon the lessor a right which he would not otherwise have had. Independently of, and notwithstanding this clause, he may sell the reversion. The whole effect of the clause was to enable him to terminate the lease, and sell the whole estate, first giving the lessees the opportunity of purchasing. This construction is fortified by the final clause, which allows to the lessees, in case of sale, the privilege of taking off the crops.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
121 Mass. 298 (Callaghan v. Hawkes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.