Callaghan v. Callaghan
This text of 233 A.2d 825 (Callaghan v. Callaghan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The libelant urges that the denial of the divorce was contrary to the weight of the evidence and should be set aside. The Trial Court found that the libelee did not treat the libelant as seriously to injure her health or endanger her reason. The findings of the Trial Court are binding where there is evidence to support them. Ballou v. Ballou, 95 N. H. 105; Cote v. Cote, 94 N. H. 372, 373; Johnson v. Johnson, 80 N. H. 15. “The Trial Judge could disbelieve the libelant’s testimony, believe the libelee’s, and enter the decree which he did.” Ballou v. Ballou, supra; Franklyn v. Franklyn, 93 N. H. 90. The record supports the Trial Court’s denial of the divorce.
Exceptions overruled.
All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.2d 825, 108 N.H. 264, 1967 N.H. LEXIS 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/callaghan-v-callaghan-nh-1967.