Callaghan v. Callaghan

233 A.2d 825, 108 N.H. 264, 1967 N.H. LEXIS 169
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided October 6, 1967·No. 5635·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Griffith, J.

The libelant urges that the denial of the divorce was contrary to the weight of the evidence and should be set aside. The Trial Court found that the libelee did not treat the libelant as seriously to injure her health or endanger her reason. The findings of the Trial Court are binding where there is evidence to support them. Ballou v. Ballou, 95 N. H. 105; Cote v. Cote, 94 N. H. 372, 373; Johnson v. Johnson, 80 N. H. 15. “The Trial Judge could disbelieve the libelant’s testimony, believe the libelee’s, and enter the decree which he did.” Ballou v. Ballou, supra; Franklyn v. Franklyn, 93 N. H. 90. The record supports the Trial Court’s denial of the divorce.

Exceptions overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Callaghan v. Callaghan, 233 A.2d 825, 108 N.H. 264, 1967 N.H. LEXIS 169 (N.H. 1967).

233 A.2d 825 (Callaghan v. Callaghan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Walker
404 A.2d 1103 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1979)
Rousseau v. Rousseau
352 A.2d 706 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1976)