Calladay v. McKinsey

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

Calladay v. McKinsey

4 F. Cas. 1073, 5 McLean 166

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

DecidedJuly 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 4 F. Cas. 1073 (Calladay v. McKinsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calladay v. McKinsey, 4 F. Cas. 1073, 5 McLean 166 (circtdoh 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

Since the commencement of this suit, the defendant, who claims under a tax title, filed his bill in the state court against the lessor of the plaintiff, a non-resident, and by publication, procured a decree of the title, no notice being given to the party nor his counsel in the case, of which the defendant had full notice. With the view of reversing this decree in the state-court, the counsel for plaintiff moved a continuance.

On the facts stated, the court continued the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Since the commencement of this suit, the defendant, who claims under a tax title, filed his bill in the state court against the lessor of the plaintiff, a non-resident, and by publication, procured a decree of the title, no notice being given to the party nor his counsel in the case, of which the defendant had full notice. With the view of reversing this decree in the state-court, the counsel for plaintiff moved a continuance.

On the facts stated, the court continued the cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 F. Cas. 1073, 5 McLean 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calladay-v-mckinsey-circtdoh-1850.