Call v. Sentra Logistics LLC

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas
DecidedDecember 8, 2023
Docket4:23-cv-00903
StatusUnknown

This text of Call v. Sentra Logistics LLC (Call v. Sentra Logistics LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Call v. Sentra Logistics LLC, (E.D. Ark. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION BETH CALL, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Jeffrey James Call, Deceased PLAINTIFF

v. No. 4:23-cv-903-DPM SENTRA LOGISTICS, LLC; JAVARUS DE’VON OWENS; JOHN DOES 1-5; and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1-5 DEFENDANTS

ORDER Jeffrey Call was severely injured in a tractor-trailer accident. He filed this lawsuit in state court in July 2023 against the trucking company, the truck driver, and other unknown parties involved in the accident. Call died two weeks later. His estate’s personal representative, Beth Call, was substituted in an amended complaint, and the case progressed. Owens, the truck driver, removed the case to this Court. Call now moves to remand, arguing that Owens’s removal was untimely and that complete diversity doesn’t exist. First, removal was timely. Owens learned about the case on 13 September 2023. Doc. 19-3. He was served on 28 September 2023. Doc. 19-2 at 6. And he filed his notice of removal on 29 September 2023. Doc. 1. His notice was well within the thirty-day time limit for removal. 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(2)(B). That time limit started running on the date

Owens was served. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 348-50 (1999). It’s immaterial that his lawyer received the complaint sooner. Ibid. Second, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Jeffrey Call was an Arkansawyer. Beth Call is, too. Sentra Logistics, LLC is a citizen of Michigan, where its sole member resides. Great River Entertainment, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Co., 81 F.4th 1261, 1263 (8th Cir. 2023). And Owens, who now lives in Florida, was a citizen of South Carolina when the original complaint was filed. Doc. 19-3 at 1; Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP v. Lewis, 40 F.4th 830, 839 (8th Cir. 2022). Complete diversity existed when the complaint was filed and still exists. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Last, Sentra’s designation of a registered agent for service in Arkansas doesn’t defeat complete diversity. And Owens is not estopped from asserting that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived by the parties or conferred by consent. United States v. Redstone, 488 F.2d 300, 301 (8th Cir. 1973).

Motion to remand, Doc. 16, denied.

Be

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge Recender_ 2023

= 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Call v. Sentra Logistics LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/call-v-sentra-logistics-llc-ared-2023.