Calkins v. Hays

4 Wis. 200
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Wis. 200 (Calkins v. Hays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calkins v. Hays, 4 Wis. 200 (Wis. 1856).

Opinion

By the Court,

Smith, J.

In this case, the justice, as is apparent, was wholly uninformed in regard to his duties and jurisdiction. Whether he imagined that he had jurisdiction of actions of ejectment, or whether it was intended to bring before the justice an action of forcible entry or detainer, it is impossible to ascertain. In either case his proceedings were all wrong, and the Circuit Court did right in reversing the judgment of the justice. The judgment of the justice was wholly void. The only question is, whether costs ought to have been awarded to the plaintiff in error. A writ of error lies to reverse a void judgment. See Lewis vs. Sercombe, 1 Wis. Rep. 394, and the cases there cited.

The judgment of the court below is reversed so far as costs were denied, and affirmed as to the residue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Sercomb
1 Wis. 394 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Wis. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calkins-v-hays-wis-1856.