Calkins v. County of Erie

178 A.D.2d 1013

This text of 178 A.D.2d 1013 (Calkins v. County of Erie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Calkins v. County of Erie, 178 A.D.2d 1013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant, County of Erie, in moving for summary judgment dismissing this personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident on a county highway, relied upon the principle of limited immunity enunciated in Weiss v Fote (7 NY2d 579, rearg denied 8 NY2d 934). That reliance was inappropriate because defendant failed to show that its decision not to install a snow fence was the product of an adequate study. Whether defendant was negligent and, if so, whether that negligence was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries, cannot be decided until all of the facts are developed at trial. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiss v. Fote
167 N.E.2d 63 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 A.D.2d 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calkins-v-county-of-erie-nyappdiv-1991.