Calkins v. Brand & Williams

New York Supreme Court

Calkins v. Brand & Williams

5 How. Pr. 395

DecidedFebruary 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 5 How. Pr. 395 (Calkins v. Brand & Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calkins v. Brand & Williams, 5 How. Pr. 395 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

Mason, Justice.

This is a motion like the above, and the defendants can not have double costs for the reason stated in my opinion in the other case, but the defendants are to have an allowance of five per cent upon $519-54, to be added to their costs of defending and inserted on the record; and as the defendants have moved for double costs, to which they are not entitled, and have put the plaintiff to the expense of opposing this motion, I am inclined not to give the party any costs on these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mason, Justice.

This is a motion like the above, and the defendants can not have double costs for the reason stated in my opinion in the other case, but the defendants are to have an allowance of five per cent upon $519-54, to be added to their costs of defending and inserted on the record; and as the defendants have moved for double costs, to which they are not entitled, and have put the plaintiff to the expense of opposing this motion, I am inclined not to give the party any costs on these motions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 How. Pr. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calkins-v-brand-williams-nysupct-1850.