Calkins & Holden, Inc. v. Seklemian & North, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Calkins & Holden, Inc. v. Seklemian & North, Inc.

8 A.D.2d 604, 187 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 21, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 604 (Calkins & Holden, Inc. v. Seklemian & North, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Calkins & Holden, Inc. v. Seklemian & North, Inc., 8 A.D.2d 604, 187 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of staying the trial of the Municipal Court action, pending the hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appellant continues to pay all rents accruing under the lease pending the hearing and determination of this appeal, upon receipt of a surety company bond from said respondent conditioned upon the repayment of said sums if it shall be finally- determined that the appellant is not liable under the lease covering the premises, and provided further, that appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before April 30, 1959, with notice of argument for May 12, 1959, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In the event that any of the above conditions are not complied with, respondents may submit an order vacating the stay without notice to the appellant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of staying the trial of the Municipal Court action, pending the hearing and determination of the appeal on condition that the appellant continues to pay all rents accruing under the lease pending the hearing and determination of this appeal, upon receipt of a surety company bond from said respondent conditioned upon the repayment of said sums if it shall be finally- determined that the appellant is not liable under the lease covering the premises, and provided further, that appellant procures the record on appeal and appellant’s points to be served and filed on or before April 30, 1959, with notice of argument for May 12, 1959, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. In the event that any of the above conditions are not complied with, respondents may submit an order vacating the stay without notice to the appellant. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 604, 187 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calkins-holden-inc-v-seklemian-north-inc-nyappdiv-1959.