Calipjo v. Purdy
This text of Calipjo v. Purdy (Calipjo v. Purdy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 03-JUL-2024 03:25 PM Dkt. 5 OGAC
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
ELESTHER CALIPJO, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
JACK PURDY; REGAL CAPITAL CORPORATION; REGAL CAPITAL COMPANY, LLC, Respondents/Defendants-Appellants.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 5CC041000003)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Petitioner Elesther Calipjo’s Application for Writ of
Certiorari, filed on May 21, 2024, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, July 3, 2024.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Calipjo v. Purdy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/calipjo-v-purdy-haw-2024.