Calinicas v. Fulton
242 A.D. 850
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in an action for personal injuries on the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice provides that the motion must be made within twenty days after service of the complaint. Here it was not made until September 25, 1934, and, therefore, was not timely. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Calinicas v. Fulton, 242 A.D. 850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 850 (Calinicas v. Fulton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ace Tackless Corp. v. Fuhrman
22 Misc. 2d 38 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.
195 Misc. 710 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)