Caliguire v. City of Union City
249 A.2d 577, 53 N.J. 182, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 239
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in the majority opinion 101 N. J. Super. 210 {App. Div. 1967).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall and Haneman—6.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caliguire v. City of Union City, 249 A.2d 577, 53 N.J. 182, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1969).
249 A.2d 577 (Caliguire v. City of Union City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JOSEPH DIRENZO VS. STEVEN KATCHEN (L-1990-10, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Rycoline Products, Inc. v. Walsh
756 A.2d 1047 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2000)
Cameco, Inc. v. Gedicke
724 A.2d 783 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)
Cameco, Inc. v. Gedicke
690 A.2d 1051 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Sun Source, Inc. v. Kuczkir
615 A.2d 1280 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Stella v. Dean Witter Reynolds
574 A.2d 468 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Dumansky v. United States
486 F. Supp. 1078 (D. New Jersey, 1980)
Scanlon v. General Motors Corp.
326 A.2d 673 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974)
Znoski v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc.
300 A.2d 164 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
Samuel Fulginiti, a Minor by His Guardian, Michael A. Marolla v. Peter Tocco and Margaret M. Tocco
462 F.2d 654 (Third Circuit, 1972)