Home/Supreme Court/Californians for an Alternative in November v. California

Californians for an Alternative in November v. California

393 U.S. 1, 89 S. Ct. 43, 21 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1129
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 7, 1968
Docket605
StatusPublished
Cited by26 cases

This text of 393 U.S. 1 (Californians for an Alternative in November v. California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Californians for an Alternative in November v. California, 393 U.S. 1, 89 S. Ct. 43, 21 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1129 (1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed. California is on the eve of a national election. Millions of ballots are being printed and in a few hours the absentee ballots will be sent out of State. Whatever may be the merits of the controversy, the shortness of time and the complicated task of preparing and distributing the ballots make it very doubtful if any effective relief would be possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rich v. Hersl
D. Maryland, 2022
State v. Lin
Idaho Court of Appeals, 2022
People v. Bivens
2021 IL App (1st) 172080-U (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2021)
Curtis Clifford Ingram v. C. Rachal
C.D. California, 2019
Rothman v. City of New York
S.D. New York, 2019
David Trejo v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2008
Raymond Frederick Patterson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Kentucky Supreme Court, 2007
American Samoa Government v. Enoka
10 Am. Samoa 3d 175 (High Court of American Samoa, 2005)
State v. Finnegan, Unpublished Decision (3-13-1998)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998
United States v. Ernest James Perkins
94 F.3d 654 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Lamont Eugene McCord v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1996
Jasper v. Motor Vehicles Division
883 P.2d 244 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
State v. Lumpkin
880 P.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)
United States v. Cornel A. Pearson
900 F.2d 257 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)
People v. Lippert
432 N.E.2d 605 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1982)
United States v. Waltzer
528 F. Supp. 646 (E.D. New York, 1981)
Stewart v. State
409 A.2d 1052 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1979)
State v. Wysocki
399 A.2d 307 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Radowick v. State
244 S.E.2d 346 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
United States v. Eli M. Gorin
564 F.2d 159 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
393 U.S. 1, 89 S. Ct. 43, 21 L. Ed. 2d 1, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/californians-for-an-alternative-in-november-v-california-scotus-1968.