California v. United States

Supreme Court

California v. United States

325 U.S. 869, 65 S. Ct. 1410

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 4, 1945

DocketNo. 1092; No. 1093; No. 1214; No. 1215

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 325 U.S. 869 (California v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

California v. United States, 325 U.S. 869, 65 S. Ct. 1410 (1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California [870]*870denied. Reported below: Nos. 1092 and 1214, 25 Cal. 2d 697, 154 P. 2d 879; Nos. 1093 and 1215, 25 Cal. 2d 719, 154 P. 2d 891.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General of California, and Clarence A. Linn, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioner in Nos. 1092 and 1093. Assistant Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Shea, Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney and Walter J. Cummings, Jr. for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California [870]*870denied. Reported below: Nos. 1092 and 1214, 25 Cal. 2d 697, 154 P. 2d 879; Nos. 1093 and 1215, 25 Cal. 2d 719, 154 P. 2d 891.

Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General of California, and Clarence A. Linn, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioner in Nos. 1092 and 1093. Assistant Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Shea, Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney and Walter J. Cummings, Jr. for the United States.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 U.S. 869, 65 S. Ct. 1410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-v-united-states-scotus-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack