California v. Hurst

381 U.S. 760, 85 S. Ct. 1796, 14 L. Ed. 2d 713, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 976
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 7, 1965·No. 45·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Linkletter v. Walker, ante, p. 618.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in Link-letter v. Walker, ante, at 640.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California v. Hurst, 381 U.S. 760, 85 S. Ct. 1796, 14 L. Ed. 2d 713, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 976 (1965).

381 U.S. 760 (California v. Hurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cockrell
408 P.2d 116 (California Supreme Court, 1965)
People v. Willard
238 Cal. App. 2d 292 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)