California v. Hurst

381 U.S. 760, 85 S. Ct. 1796, 14 L. Ed. 2d 713, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 976
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 7, 1965
Docket45
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 381 U.S. 760 (California v. Hurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
California v. Hurst, 381 U.S. 760, 85 S. Ct. 1796, 14 L. Ed. 2d 713, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 976 (1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Linkletter v. Walker, ante, p. 618.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in Link-letter v. Walker, ante, at 640.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cockrell
408 P.2d 116 (California Supreme Court, 1965)
People v. Willard
238 Cal. App. 2d 292 (California Court of Appeal, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 U.S. 760, 85 S. Ct. 1796, 14 L. Ed. 2d 713, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-v-hurst-scotus-1965.