California v. Holladay
159 U.S. 415, 16 S. Ct. 53, 40 L. Ed. 202, 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2308
Opinion
The opinions of the Supreme Court of California in this case are reported 68 California, 439; 93 California, 241; 102 California, 661. The motion to dismiss is sustained on the authority of San Francisco v. Itsell, 133 U. S. 65; Beatty v. Benton, 135 U. S. 244; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; and cases cited. And see Hoadley v. San Francisco, 94 U. S. 4; Hoadley v. San Francisco, 124 U. S. 639.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California v. Holladay, 159 U.S. 415, 16 S. Ct. 53, 40 L. Ed. 202, 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2308 (1895).
159 U.S. 415 (California v. Holladay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. Miami Beach Improvement Co.
46 So. 2d 26 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)
Boehringer v. Yuma County
140 P. 507 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1914)
Jones v. Vane
200 U.S. 614 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.
159 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1895)