California v. Hodari D.

498 U.S. 807, 111 S. Ct. 38, 112 L. Ed. 2d 15, 59 U.S.L.W. 3243, 1990 U.S. LEXIS 4246
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 1, 1990·No. No. 89-1632·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California v. Hodari D., 498 U.S. 807, 111 S. Ct. 38, 112 L. Ed. 2d 15, 59 U.S.L.W. 3243, 1990 U.S. LEXIS 4246 (1990).

498 U.S. 807 (California v. Hodari D.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue
937 P.2d 154 (Washington Supreme Court, 1997)
Tingley Systems, Inc. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.
919 F. Supp. 48 (D. Massachusetts, 1996)
Bothwell v. Republic Tobacco Co.
912 F. Supp. 1221 (D. Nebraska, 1995)
Triplett Grille, Inc. v. City of Akron
816 F. Supp. 1249 (N.D. Ohio, 1993)
Runyon v. Fasi
762 F. Supp. 280 (D. Hawaii, 1991)
United States v. Thomas Crotinger
928 F.2d 203 (Sixth Circuit, 1991)
One Toma, Inc. v. Heide
758 F. Supp. 1322 (W.D. Missouri, 1991)
Smith v. Our Lady of Lake Hospital, Inc.
135 F.R.D. 139 (M.D. Louisiana, 1991)
State v. White
464 N.W.2d 585 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1990)
Walker v. City of Kansas City
919 F.2d 1339 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)
Stanfield v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
752 F. Supp. 726 (W.D. Louisiana, 1990)