California v. Braeseke
446 U.S. 932, 100 S. Ct. 2147
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded to consider whether judgment is based on federal or state constitutional grounds, or both. California v. Krivda, 409 U. S. 33 (1972).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California v. Braeseke, 446 U.S. 932, 100 S. Ct. 2147 (1980).
446 U.S. 932 (California v. Braeseke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hin
California Supreme Court, 2025
People v. Carter
2023 IL App (1st) 200091-U (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2023)
In re S.E.
California Court of Appeal, 2020
People v. Stewart CA1/5
California Court of Appeal, 2015
People v. Smith
150 P.3d 1224 (California Supreme Court, 2007)
People v. Johnwell
18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 286 (California Court of Appeal, 2004)
United States v. Torres
60 M.J. 559 (Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, 2004)
State v. Pillar
820 A.2d 1 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
People v. Memro
905 P.2d 1305 (California Supreme Court, 1995)
People v. Johnson
859 P.2d 673 (California Supreme Court, 1993)
People v. Castellanos
219 Cal. App. 3d 1163 (California Court of Appeal, 1990)
People v. Davis
189 Cal. App. 3d 1177 (California Court of Appeal, 1987)
Oregon v. Elstad
470 U.S. 298 (Supreme Court, 1985)
People v. Williams
637 P.2d 1029 (California Supreme Court, 1981)