California Treasure Box v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

California Treasure Box v. Superior Court

37 P.2d 731, 2 Cal. App. 2d 202, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1401

California Court of Appeal·Decided November 13, 1934·No. Civ. No. 9595·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

STEPHENS, P. J.

This proceeding is one in mandamus to require the discharge of an attachment issued out of an action in the superior court. It is alleged in the complaint that corporate stock was purchased by the plaintiff under defendant’s false pretenses and that plaintiff promptly rescinded. The prayer is for the return of the purchase money paid with interest.

The facts bring the issue within the principles expressed in McCall v. Superior Court, 1 Cal. (2d) 527 [36 Pac. (2d) 642].

The alternative writ is discharged and the peremptory writ is denied.

Crail, J., and Willis, J., pro tern., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STEPHENS, P. J.

This proceeding is one in mandamus to require the discharge of an attachment issued out of an action in the superior court. It is alleged in the complaint that corporate stock was purchased by the plaintiff under defendant’s false pretenses and that plaintiff promptly rescinded. The prayer is for the return of the purchase money paid with interest.

The facts bring the issue within the principles expressed in McCall v. Superior Court, 1 Cal. (2d) 527 [36 Pac. (2d) 642].

The alternative writ is discharged and the peremptory writ is denied.

Crail, J., and Willis, J., pro tern., concurred.

California Treasure Box v. Superior Court, 37 P.2d 731, 2 Cal. App. 2d 202, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1401 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

37 P.2d 731 (California Treasure Box v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related