California Treasure Box v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

California Treasure Box v. Superior Court

37 P.2d 731, 2 Cal. App. 2d 202, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1401

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 13, 1934

DocketCiv. No. 9595

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 P.2d 731 (California Treasure Box v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

California Treasure Box v. Superior Court, 37 P.2d 731, 2 Cal. App. 2d 202, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1401 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

STEPHENS, P. J.

This proceeding is one in mandamus to require the discharge of an attachment issued out of an action in the superior court. It is alleged in the complaint that corporate stock was purchased by the plaintiff under defendant’s false pretenses and that plaintiff promptly rescinded. The prayer is for the return of the purchase money paid with interest.

The facts bring the issue within the principles expressed in McCall v. Superior Court, 1 Cal. (2d) 527 [36 Pac. (2d) 642].

The alternative writ is discharged and the peremptory writ is denied.

Crail, J., and Willis, J., pro tern., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI