Home/Supreme Court/California State Board of Optometry v. California Citizens Action Group

California State Board of Optometry v. California Citizens Action Group

424 U.S. 961, 96 S. Ct. 1454, 47 L. Ed. 2d 729, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 264
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 22, 1976
DocketNo. A-760
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 424 U.S. 961 (California State Board of Optometry v. California Citizens Action Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
California State Board of Optometry v. California Citizens Action Group, 424 U.S. 961, 96 S. Ct. 1454, 47 L. Ed. 2d 729, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 264 (1976).

Opinion

Application to stay preliminary injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entered February 5, 1976, presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending further order of the Court. Mr. Jus[962]*962tice Stevens would deny the application. Motion of Terminai-Hudson Electronics of California, Inc., dba Opti-Cal, for leave to intervene as an appellee denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Custom Nutrition Labs., LLC
912 F.3d 316 (Sixth Circuit, 2018)
Ricks v. Pauch
322 F. Supp. 3d 813 (E.D. Michigan, 2018)
Jeffrey Moldowan v. Maureen Fournier
578 F.3d 351 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
Moldowan v. City of Warren
573 F.3d 309 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
Blake v. Race
487 F. Supp. 2d 187 (E.D. New York, 2007)
McMILLIAN v. JOHNSON
88 F.3d 1554 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)
Knapper v. Connick
681 So. 2d 944 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)
James Walker v. The City of New York
974 F.2d 293 (Second Circuit, 1992)
Foster v. Jeffers
813 S.W.2d 449 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1991)
Nygren v. Predovich
637 F. Supp. 1083 (D. Colorado, 1986)
Carter v. Harrison
612 F. Supp. 749 (E.D. New York, 1985)
Scott v. Foltz
612 F. Supp. 50 (E.D. Michigan, 1985)
Lopez v. Ruhl
584 F. Supp. 639 (W.D. Michigan, 1984)
Krohn v. United States
578 F. Supp. 1441 (D. Massachusetts, 1983)
Hauptmann v. Wilentz
570 F. Supp. 351 (D. New Jersey, 1983)
Overman v. Klein
654 P.2d 888 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1982)
Strachan v. Ashe
548 F. Supp. 1193 (D. Massachusetts, 1982)
Martinez v. Winner
548 F. Supp. 278 (D. Colorado, 1982)
Earl Charles v. F. W. Wade, Leo B. Ryan and City of Savannah, Georgia
665 F.2d 661 (Fifth Circuit, 1982)
Carlisle W. Briscoe v. Sgt. Martin Lahue, Charles Talley, Jr. v. James D. Crosson, Chris P. Vickers, Sr. And James N. Ballard v. Sgt. James W. Hunley, Individually and in His Capacity as an Agent or Employee of the Cedar Lake, Indiana Police Department
663 F.2d 713 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 U.S. 961, 96 S. Ct. 1454, 47 L. Ed. 2d 729, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-state-board-of-optometry-v-california-citizens-action-group-scotus-1976.