California Redwood Co. v. Mahan

87 F. 1004, 31 C.C.A. 592, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2050
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 1898
DocketNo. 404
StatusPublished

This text of 87 F. 1004 (California Redwood Co. v. Mahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
California Redwood Co. v. Mahan, 87 F. 1004, 31 C.C.A. 592, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2050 (9th Cir. 1898).

Opinion

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This is a companion case to that of California Redwood Co. v. Litle, ubi supra; but the special point relied upon by appellant in this case is that the cancellation of the entry for fraud was made without notice to the claimant or parties interested. The facts are identical with those presented upon this point in Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C. C. A. 293,. 64 Fed. 553, 556; and, upon the principles announced in that case and the authorities there cited, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Mortg. Co. of Scotland v. Hopper
64 F. 553 (Ninth Circuit, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 F. 1004, 31 C.C.A. 592, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-redwood-co-v-mahan-ca9-1898.