California Redwood Co. v. Litle

Ninth Circuit

California Redwood Co. v. Litle

87 F. 1004, 31 C.C.A. 591, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2049

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 3, 1898·No. No. 403·Published

Opinion

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This case presents substantially the same questions that were involved in Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C. C. A. 293, 64 Fed. 553, 559. We are asked to review the question relative to the rights of bona fide purchasers, for value, before the issuance of a patent. We adhere to the views expressed upon this point in the Hopper Case, repeated and followed by this court in Diller v. Hawley, 26 C. C. A. 514, 81 Fed. 651, 655; and, upon the principles therein announced, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This case presents substantially the same questions that were involved in Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C. C. A. 293, 64 Fed. 553, 559. We are asked to review the question relative to the rights of bona fide purchasers, for value, before the issuance of a patent. We adhere to the views expressed upon this point in the Hopper Case, repeated and followed by this court in Diller v. Hawley, 26 C. C. A. 514, 81 Fed. 651, 655; and, upon the principles therein announced, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

California Redwood Co. v. Litle, 87 F. 1004, 31 C.C.A. 591, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2049 (9th Cir. 1898).

Pincite

87 F. 1004 (California Redwood Co. v. Litle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related