California Redwood Co. v. Litle

Ninth Circuit

California Redwood Co. v. Litle

87 F. 1004, 31 C.C.A. 591, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2049

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 3, 1898

DocketNo. 403

StatusPublished

This text of 87 F. 1004 (California Redwood Co. v. Litle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

California Redwood Co. v. Litle, 87 F. 1004, 31 C.C.A. 591, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2049 (9th Cir. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This case presents substantially the same questions that were involved in Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C. C. A. 293, 64 Fed. 553, 559. We are asked to review the question relative to the rights of bona fide purchasers, for value, before the issuance of a patent. We adhere to the views expressed upon this point in the Hopper Case, repeated and followed by this court in Diller v. Hawley, 26 C. C. A. 514, 81 Fed. 651, 655; and, upon the principles therein announced, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWLEY, District Judge.

This case presents substantially the same questions that were involved in Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C. C. A. 293, 64 Fed. 553, 559. We are asked to review the question relative to the rights of bona fide purchasers, for value, before the issuance of a patent. We adhere to the views expressed upon this point in the Hopper Case, repeated and followed by this court in Diller v. Hawley, 26 C. C. A. 514, 81 Fed. 651, 655; and, upon the principles therein announced, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 F. 1004, 31 C.C.A. 591, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-redwood-co-v-litle-ca9-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack