California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Arnett
145 L. Ed. 2d 807, 120 S. Ct. 930, 528 U.S. 1111, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 403, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 555, 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 96, 68 U.S.L.W. 3458, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 586
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 18, 2000·No. No. 99-850·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Kimel v. Florida Bd. of Regents, ante, p. 62.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Arnett, 145 L. Ed. 2d 807, 120 S. Ct. 930, 528 U.S. 1111, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 403, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 555, 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 96, 68 U.S.L.W. 3458, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 586 (U.S. 2000).
145 L. Ed. 2d 807 (California Public Employees' Retirement System v. Arnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arnett v. California Public Employees Retirement System
207 F.3d 565 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)
Arnett v. California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS)
207 F.3d 565 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)