California Oil & Gas Co. v. Miller

106 F. 990, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4773
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California·Decided November 1, 1900·No. No. 854·Published

Opinion

WELLBORN, District Judge.

So far as concerns the question of federal jurisdiction, the amended and supplemental bill is substantially tbe same as the original bill, for which latter see 96 Fed. 12, and I am confirmed in the views there expressed by the late ease of Blackburn v. Mining Co., 175 U. S. 571, 20 Sup. Ct. 222, 44 L. Ed. 276. Since the amended and supplemental bill fails 10 show a federal question, it is unnecessary to determine whether. or not the allegations of said amended and supplemental bill as to the possession of .the property are the same, as, or different from, those of the original bill. The demurrer will be sustained. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California Oil & Gas Co. v. Miller, 106 F. 990, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4773 (circtsdca 1900).

106 F. 990 (California Oil & Gas Co. v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.
175 U.S. 571 (Supreme Court, 1900)
California Oil & Gas Co. of Arizona v. Miller
96 F. 12 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California, 1899)