California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith

175 P. 16, 178 Cal. 812, 1918 Cal. LEXIS 572
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 1918
DocketSac. No. 2575. Department Two. Sac. No. 2576. Department Two.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 175 P. 16 (California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith, 175 P. 16, 178 Cal. 812, 1918 Cal. LEXIS 572 (Cal. 1918).

Opinion

By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [175 P. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunning Brothers Co. v. Johnson
190 P. 829 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith
175 P. 13 (California Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 P. 16, 178 Cal. 812, 1918 Cal. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-midland-railway-co-v-smith-cal-1918.