California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith

California Supreme Court

California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith

175 P. 16, 178 Cal. 812, 1918 Cal. LEXIS 572

California Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 1918·No. Sac. No. 2575. Department Two. Sac. No. 2576. Department Two.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [175 P. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [175 P. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.

*Page 1

California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith, 175 P. 16, 178 Cal. 812, 1918 Cal. LEXIS 572 (Cal. 1918).

Pincite

175 P. 16 (California Midland Railway Co. v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related