California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari
This text of 990 F.2d 519 (California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Pursuant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court, the prior judgment of this court is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court, where the motion for leave to file in forma pauperis must be denied. Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, — U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 716, 726, 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
990 F.2d 519, 93 Daily Journal DAR 4654, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2687, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7686, 1993 WL 108131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-mens-colony-unit-ii-mens-adv-council-v-james-rowland-ca9-1993.