California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari
990 F.2d 519, 93 Daily Journal DAR 4654, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2687, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7686, 1993 WL 108131
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari. Read the opinion of the Court — 939 F.2d 854 →
Opinion
ORDER
Pursuant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court, the prior judgment of this court is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court, where the motion for leave to file in forma pauperis must be denied. Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, — U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 716, 726, 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari, 990 F.2d 519, 93 Daily Journal DAR 4654, 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2687, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 7686, 1993 WL 108131 (9th Cir. 1993).
990 F.2d 519 (California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie Bandaccari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council
506 U.S. 194 (Supreme Court, 1993)