California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.

Supreme Court

California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.

280 U.S. 520, 50 S. Ct. 67

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 28, 1929·No. No. 392·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of Feb. 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground that the decree sought to be reviewed is not a [521]*521final one. Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, 183 U. S. 130, 131; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Arnold v. United States for the use of Guimarin & Co., 263 U. S. 427, 434.

Mr. F. Eldred Boland for appellant. Mr. Albert H. Elliott for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of Feb. 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground that the decree sought to be reviewed is not a [521]*521final one. Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, 183 U. S. 130, 131; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Arnold v. United States for the use of Guimarin & Co., 263 U. S. 427, 434.

Mr. F. Eldred Boland for appellant. Mr. Albert H. Elliott for appellee.

California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc., 280 U.S. 520, 50 S. Ct. 67 (1929).

Pincite

280 U.S. 520 (California Delta Farms, Inc. v. Chinese American Farms, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related