California Credit Collection Corporation v. Mooney

California Supreme Court

California Credit Collection Corporation v. Mooney

248 P. 1020, 199 Cal. 780, 1926 Cal. LEXIS 327

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 23, 1926

DocketDocket No. S.F. 11927.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 P. 1020 (California Credit Collection Corporation v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

California Credit Collection Corporation v. Mooney, 248 P. 1020, 199 Cal. 780, 1926 Cal. LEXIS 327 (Cal. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM CASES. THE COURT.

Upon examination of the record in this case we are satisfied that the trial court was in error as to each of the two main questions presented upon this appeal. We are further satisfied that a practically parallel situation is presented upon this appeal as that presented and considered by the district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district in the cases ofCalifornia Credit Collection Corp. v. Randall (Cal.App.),244 P. 958, California Credit Collection Corp. v. Goodin (Cal.App.), 246 P. 121, and California Credit CollectionCorp. v. Carpenter (Cal.App.), 246 P. 126.

In the latter two of the above cases a petition for hearing in this court was denied. Upon the authority of these cases the judgment herein is reversed. *Page 781

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM CASES. THE COURT.

Upon examination of the record in this case we are satisfied that the trial court was in error as to each of the two main questions presented upon this appeal. We are further satisfied that a practically parallel situation is presented upon this appeal as that presented and considered by the district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district in the cases ofCalifornia Credit Collection Corp. v. Randall (Cal.App.),244 P. 958, California Credit Collection Corp. v. Goodin (Cal.App.), 246 P. 121, and California Credit CollectionCorp. v. Carpenter (Cal.App.), 246 P. 126.

In the latter two of the above cases a petition for hearing in this court was denied. Upon the authority of these cases the judgment herein is reversed. *Page 781

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 P. 1020, 199 Cal. 780, 1926 Cal. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/california-credit-collection-corporation-v-mooney-cal-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack