California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Mooney

199 Cal. 780
California Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 1926·No. S. F. No. 11927·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

Upon examination of the record in this case we are satisfied that the trial court was in error as to each of the two main questions presented upon this appeal. We are further satisfied that a practically parallel situation is presented upon this appeal as that presented and considered by the district court of appeal in and for the third appellate district in the cases of California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Randall (Cal. App.), 244 Pac. 958, California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Goodin (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 121, and California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Carpenter (Cal. App.), 246 Pac. 126.

In the latter two of the above .cases a petition for hearing in this court was denied. Upon the authority of these cases the judgment herein is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Mooney, 199 Cal. 780 (Cal. 1926).

199 Cal. 780 (California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Mooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

California Credit & Collection Co. v. Carpenter
246 P. 126 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Goodin
246 P. 121 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
California Credit & Collection Corp. v. Randall
244 P. 958 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)